Primary cutaneous nocardiosis of the head and neck in an immunocompetent patient
- 1 Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- 2 Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- 3 Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Correspondence to Claudio Tirso Acevedo; claudio.acevedo@usz.ch
Abstract
Nocardiosis is known to be an opportunistic infection most commonly affecting immunocompromised patients that can lead to life-threatening conditions. Primary cutaneous disease remains a rare manifestation and unlike pulmonary or disseminated nocardiosis, it usually affects immunocompetent individuals. We present a case of a primary cutaneous nocardiosis of the head and neck after an insect bite in a healthy 50-year-old woman who had recently travelled from Greece. She presented with a painful right-sided swelling of her face and neck and an ulcerated plaque over the right temple. Biopsy of the plaque revealed inflammation with abscess formation indicating underlying infection. Culture from the biopsy showed growth of Nocardia spp and 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis identified Nocardia brasiliensis. The patient was treated with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and subsequently switched to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid due to a drug eruption. Antibiotic therapy was continued for a total of 3 months with complete resolution of the skin lesions.
Background
Nocardia spp are aerobic gram-positive bacteria that are environmentally ubiquitous and belong to the actinomycetes group of bacteria.1 They typically cause opportunistic infections in immunocompromised patients although immunocompetent hosts may also be affected.2–5 There exists no internationally accepted classification scheme for nocardiosis to date, however, the clinical categories of pulmonary, disseminated and primary cutaneous nocardiosis are widely established. While the first two usually affect immunocompromised patients (eg, solid organ transplant recipients), primary cutaneous nocardiosis is typically an infection in immunocompetent hosts caused mainly by local trauma and subsequent environmental contamination.2–5 Nocardia brasiliensis is the species most frequently associated with cutaneous disease and mainly isolated in areas with tropical or subtropical climates.1 Clinical findings vary and cutaneous infection may present with cellulitis, abscesses, ulcerations, erythematous nodules or pyoderma. Thus, a clinical diagnosis of cutaneous nocardiosis is difficult, as it resembles other cutaneous bacterial infections (mainly Staphylococcus aureus, group A streptococcus), cutaneous fungal infections (such as sporotrichosis, cryptococcosis, histoplasmosis, blastomycosis or coccidiomycosis) and cutaneous parasitic infections (mainly leishmaniosis). Furthermore, infections caused by mycobacteria and cutaneous neoplastic disease have to be considered in the differential diagnosis. Moreover, diagnosis and treatment are often delayed due to the slow growth of nocardia in culture.6
Case presentation
A 50-year-old woman was referred to the University Hospital Zurich with a painful swelling of the right side of her face with extension to the neck, and an ulcerated plaque at her right temple. The patient returned from Greece the previous day and reported that she had been bitten by an unknown insect at the location of the plaque approximately 5 days ago. Over the intervening days, she developed fever and noticed a painful swelling spreading from the insect bite to the ipsilateral eyelid and down to the neck. After consulting a physician in Greece, an antibiotic therapy was started with oral cefuroxime. As the fever and swelling persisted throughout the therapy, she presented with the symptoms to a primary care physician in Switzerland, who referred her to a local hospital with subsequent admission to the University Hospital Zurich, a tertiary care hospital, on the same day. The patient’s medical history was otherwise unremarkable.
On admission, physical examination revealed the presence of an ulcerated plaque, 3.5×3.5 cm in diameter, with little purulent secretion at her right temple. The surrounding soft tissue showed inflammation, with painful erythematous swelling without induration, extending to the ipsilateral periorbital region and down to the neck (figure 1). Vital signs were: heart rate 88 bpm, blood pressure 125/77 mm Hg, temperature 37.6°C and peripheral oxygen saturation 94% without supplemental oxygen. Cranial nerve function was intact, and oral inspection was unremarkable.
(A) and (B) Initial presentation with right-sided swelling of the face and an ulcerated plaque at the temple. (C) Two weeks after initial admission.

Initial laboratory investigations showed a white cell count of 14.26×109/L (reference range: 3.0–9.6×109/L) and a C-reactive protein level of 138 mg/L (reference range: <5 mg/L). Additionally, a slightly elevated alanine transaminase of 45 U/L (reference range: <35 U/L) and gamma-glutamyltransferase of 103 U/L (reference range: 35–105 U/L) were detected.
A contrast-enhanced CT of the head and neck demonstrated diffuse reticulation of subcutaneous fat in the area of the right cheek and temple with subcutaneous and superficial soft-tissue swelling reaching the periorbital and preauricular region (figure 2). There were no radiological signs of major abscess formation, bone infiltration, vascular infiltration or cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.
(A) and (B) Contrast-enhanced CT scan showing diffuse reticulation of subcutaneous fat in the area of the right cheek and temple with subcutaneous and superficial soft-tissue swelling reaching the periorbital and preauricular region.

Blood cultures were obtained and wound swabs were taken from the ulcerated plaque for microbiological examination. An antibiotic treatment was started with vancomycin and cefepime. This regimen was chosen due to the reportedly high prevalence of drug-resistant bacteria in Greece, such as methicillin-resistant S. aureus and other multidrug-resistant bacteria.7 A biopsy of the ulcerated plaque revealed considerable inflammation with abscess formation indicating an underlying infection. Microbiological examination of aspirated pus and blood cultures remained negative. Screening for HIV was negative using a fourth-generation ELISA, as was screening for syphilis using a Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay. Broad spectrum bacterial (16S rRNA gene) PCRs of initial wound swabs were negative, as were specific PCRs for Franciscella tularensis and Leishmania spp. After 8 days of incubation, gram-positive rods were detected in the microbial culture of the initial wound swab, leading to change of antibiotic therapy to intravenous amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. The isolate was identified as Nocardia spp by partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing. However, the exact species could not be identified as the sequence information did not allow for differentiation between N. brasiliensis and N. vulneris. Histopathology of the skin biopsy using Brown Brenn staining identified a thin and branching structure consistent with Nocardia spp (figure 3). Antibiotic therapy was changed to intravenous trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) at a dosage of 400 mg TMP every 8 hours. Susceptibility testing using ETEST (bioMérieux SA, France) revealed that the isolate was susceptible to TMP/SMX8 (minimum inhibition concentration (MIC)=0.64 mg/L) and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid9 (MIC=0.75 mg/L), intermediate to minocycline8 (MIC=2.0 mg/L) and resistant to cefepime9 (MIC=12.0 mg/L). Regular wound irrigation and consequent antibiotic therapy led to substantial clinical improvement and normalisation of C-reactive protein (CRP). After 17 days, the patient was discharged from the hospital and antibiotic treatment was modified to TMP 160 mg/SMX 800 mg, two tablets three times per day.
Histopathology of the skin biopsy using Brown Brenn staining shows a thin and filamentous structure consistent with Nocardia spp.

Outcome and follow-up
Initial follow-up was performed 6 days after hospital discharge. The patient stated that the day prior to the follow-up appointment a non-pruritic rash had started to develop on her arms and chest. She denied any other symptoms. At presentation, vital signs were normal and physical examination revealed a symmetric, erythematous maculopapular rash on the chest and arms sparing the palms and mucous membranes. Laboratory workup demonstrated mild lymphopenia of 0.6×109/L (reference range: 1.5–4.0×109/L) and slightly elevated liver enzymes with alanine transaminase of 81 U/L (reference range: <35 U/L) and aspartate transaminase of 73 U/L (reference range: <35 U/L). Based on the clinical course and a change of antibiotic therapy to TMP/SMX 13 days prior to the onset of the rash, we suspected a cutaneous drug eruption due to TMP/SMX, indicating a mild delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction. The patient was treated with oral antihistamines until resolution of pruritus and antibiotic treatment was changed to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 875/125 mg three times per day to complete a total antibiotic treatment duration of 3 months. Close follow-up was conducted by the family doctor with resolution of the erythematous rash and normalisation of haemogram and liver enzymes. After a total of 3 months of antibiotic therapy, complete resolution of the skin lesion was observed.
Discussion
Nocardia spp are aerobic gram-positive, catalase-positive mildly acid-fast bacteria that belong to the order of actinomycetales.1 Microscopically they appear as beaded, thin, branching and filamentous organisms.1 Nocardia is found ubiquitously in the environment in fresh and salt water, soil, dust and decomposing vegetation.1 Since the introduction of novel molecular techniques in the late 1980s, the taxonomy of Nocardia has changed due to the recognition of numerous new species.10–13 There are about 147 identified species of Nocardia of which over 50 have been shown to be potentially pathogenic in humans.10 14 Nocardia spp are found all over the world but the geographic distribution varies by species: for example, N. brasiliensis is found mainly in tropical or subtropical climates.1 5 Nocardiosis is typically known to be an opportunistic infection most commonly affecting immunocompromised patients, although immunocompetent hosts may also be affected.2–5 Despite the lack of a commonly accepted classification for nocardiosis, they are widely categorised as pulmonary, disseminated and primary cutaneous nocardiosis.2–5 Pulmonary nocardiosis is the most common manifestation in immunosuppressed patients and is believed to be acquired through inhalation of airborne spores.2–5 Extrapulmonary or disseminated disease mostly originates from the lungs and frequently affects the skin and soft tissues. Rarely, it spreads to the central nervous system with formation of brain abscesses.2–5 Primary cutaneous disease remains a rare manifestation and unlike pulmonary and disseminated nocardiosis it usually affects immunocompetent individuals. It can present either as superficial cellulitis, lymphocutaneous infection or as mycetoma.2–5 Infection usually occurs after local trauma and subsequent exposure of the wound to contaminated soil.1 5 In the case described, the route of transmission was thought to be secondary to an insect bite. To our knowledge, there have only been a few case reports of primary cutaneous nocardiosis in immunocompetent patients in Switzerland.15 16 In a clinical review by Ambrosioni et al, a total of three cases of primary cutaneous nocardiosis have been documented at the University hospital of Geneva between 1989 and 2009.4
Culture of the primary site of infection should be pursued early when suspecting nocardiosis as cultures may take several weeks to grow.6 It is important to inform the diagnostic laboratories when Nocardia is suspected to ensure optimal culture conditions. Modified acid-fast staining and particularly gram stain are important diagnostic tools for initial evaluation while awaiting culture results.1 4 6 An additional challenge is that once the organism has been isolated, most phenotypic techniques do not allow a reliable identification of the exact species. Recently, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation-time-of-flight mass spectrometry has been shown to be a rapid and accurate technique to identify Nocardia spp and corresponding databases are being extended continuously.11–13 Importantly, standard extraction methods using formic acid can be insufficient to obtain high quality spectra from Nocardia spp; thus, the application of customised sample preparation methods may be considered.13
In the case presented here, identification of Nocardia was accomplished by a combination of tissue culture and PCR analysis. Gram-positive rods suspicious for Nocardia spp grew from the initial wound swab of the ulcerated plaque after 8 days of incubation. Since partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing did not allow for unambiguous species assignment, whole genome sequencing was performed using an Illumina MiSeq instrument. DNA extraction, library preparation and processing of raw sequencing data were conducted as previously described.17 The causative agent was eventually identified as N. brasiliensis based on the full-length sequence of the 16S rRNA gene. Contig assembly yielded a genome of approximately 9.44 Mbp in size. Automated genome annotation using the Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology server identified 9176 coding regions, including various virulence factors involved in establishing the infection and promoting host persistence.18
Nocardiosis remains a rare disease and therefore randomised therapeutic trials have not been conducted. Sulfonamides, especially TMP/SMX, have been the standard treatment for over 60 years. In light of emerging antimicrobial resistance, alternative antibiotics have to be considered.1 4 5 It has been shown that rates of antibiotic resistance differ between geographic regions and among different species of Nocardia.5 Thus, susceptibility testing should be performed to ensure the optimal therapy. The choice of initial empirical treatment depends on the clinical presentation and involved organs. For disseminated or severe nocardiosis, combination therapy with two or more active agents is recommended.4 For primary cutaneous nocardiosis,monotherapy with TMP/SMX is usually sufficient, although combination therapy should be considered in case of deep infections such as mycetoma.4 19 Besides sulfonamides, the antimicrobial agents with the best in vitro activity against Nocardia include fluoroquinolones (eg, moxifloxacin), aminoglycosides (eg, amikacin), tetracyclines (eg, minocycline or tigecycline), carbapenems (eg, imipenem or meropenem) and the oxazolidinone linezolid.20 21 Notably, sulfonamides are known to frequently cause adverse events including allergic reactions, as was the case with our patient. The duration of treatment depends on the affected organs and on whether the host is immunocompetent. While antibiotic treatment of 1–3 months for primary cutaneous nocardiosis is considered adequate, disseminated and pulmonary disease should be treated for at least 6 months. If the central nervous system is affected, recommended minimum treatment duration is 1 year.4 In this case, a high dosage of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid was chosen to achieve high drug levels, which is common practice in Switzerland. The dosage and treatment duration was determined by discussion among the staff physicians. There are currently no randomised controlled trials and therefore treatment duration must be decided on an individual basis. In our patient, complete resolution of clinical manifestations was achieved after a total of 3 months of therapy.
Learning points
-
Nocardiosis typically is an opportunistic infection in immunocompromised patients although immunocompetent hosts may also be affected, with primary cutaneous infection being the most common manifestation in otherwise healthy patients.
-
Primary cutaneous nocardiosis usually presents as superficial cellulitis, lymphocutaneous infection or mycetoma, mimicking a wide range of other bacterial, fungal and parasitic cutaneous infections.
-
Diagnosis and treatment are often delayed due to the slow growth of Nocardia spp in culture. Culture from the primary site of infection should therefore be performed as soon as possible and microbiological laboratories should always be alerted when Nocardia spp is suspected to ensure optimal culture conditions.
Acknowledgments
Special thanks to all the healthcare providers of the Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology and Department of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial and Oral Surgery of University Hospital Zurich involved in treating the patient and to Professor Annelies Zinkernagel for support and contribution to the work.
Footnotes
-
Contributors FI contributed by the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the microbiological data. EMM contributed by the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the histopathological data. SDDB contributed to the plan, conception and design. CTA is the corresponding author and contributed to the conduction, plan, conception and design of the work and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript and approved the final version.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer